SAN FRANCISCO, Oct 15 (Reuters) – An Apple worker who led fellow employees in publicly sharing cases of what they known as harassment and discrimination on the firm mentioned on Thursday that she had been fired.
Janneke Parrish, an Apple program supervisor, mentioned the iPhone maker knowledgeable her on Thursday that she had been terminated for deleting materials on firm tools whereas she was beneath investigation over the leaking of an organization city corridor to media. She advised Reuters she denies leaking.
Parrish mentioned she deleted apps that contained particulars of her funds and different private info earlier than handing her units in to Apple as a part of the probe.
Parrish mentioned she believes she was fired for her activism within the office.
“To me, this appears clearly retaliatory for the truth that I used to be talking out about abuses which have occurred at my employer, pay fairness and, usually, about our office circumstances,” she mentioned.
Apple mentioned Friday it doesn’t talk about particular worker issues.
Apple has just lately skilled different examples of worker unrest. Final month, two Apple workers advised Reuters they’d filed charges in opposition to the corporate with the Nationwide Labor Relations Board. The employees accused Apple of retaliation and halting dialogue of pay amongst workers, amongst different allegations.
Apple has mentioned that it’s “deeply dedicated to creating and sustaining a constructive and inclusive office” and that it takes “all considerations” from workers critically.
U.S. regulation protects the best of workers to overtly talk about sure matters, together with working circumstances, discrimination and equal pay.
Over the summer time, present and former Apple workers started detailing on social media what they mentioned have been experiences of harassment and discrimination. Parrish and a few colleagues started publishing the tales on social media and a publishing platform in a weekly digest titled ‘#AppleToo.’
Parrish mentioned she was cautious to respect firm guidelines and by no means shared info that she believed to be confidential. She mentioned she continued to publish the ‘#AppleToo’ digest after coming beneath investigation on the finish of September.
“If something, it is made the significance of that work clearer than ever, when Apple’s response to criticism is to begin inside investigations into people who it desires to see gone,” she mentioned. “It is simpler for them to terminate folks than it’s for them to truly hear.”
Reporting by Julia Love; modifying by Peter Henderson and Rosalba O’Brien
Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.